Complaint on the basis of cell phone studies in SCENIHR final report and public consultation - 29 April 2015
Etienne CENDRIER, Spokesman for Robin des Toits
Iris ATZMON
Dr. Med. Christine ASCHERMANN
Prof Lennart Hardell's five studies were the subject of the letter from Dr. Kjell Hansson Mild to the
Commission, arguing that all five studies were omitted from the preliminary opinion on purpose by Dr. Joachim Schüz. The commission replied, that the five studies would be taken into account in the final opinion, and that Dr. Schüz was an external expert.
According to the results of the public consultation on the final SCENIHR report, the SCENIHR replied on Hardell's submission, that "All references were considered in the Opinion".
But when Prof' Hardell examined this, he found that this paper was not included:
Read more »
Etienne CENDRIER, Spokesman for Robin des Toits
Iris ATZMON
Dr. Med. Christine ASCHERMANN
Prof Lennart Hardell's five studies were the subject of the letter from Dr. Kjell Hansson Mild to the
Commission, arguing that all five studies were omitted from the preliminary opinion on purpose by Dr. Joachim Schüz. The commission replied, that the five studies would be taken into account in the final opinion, and that Dr. Schüz was an external expert.
According to the results of the public consultation on the final SCENIHR report, the SCENIHR replied on Hardell's submission, that "All references were considered in the Opinion".
But when Prof' Hardell examined this, he found that this paper was not included:
Read more »