Quantcast
Channel: Towards Better Health
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8743

Chemical Reactions: Glyphosate and the Politics of Chemical Safety

$
0
0
A farmer spraying crops near Thurstonland in Holme
Valley, West Yorkshire,  Photo:  Ian Dagnall/ Alamy
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which recently classified glyphosate as a "probable human carcinogen” (2A), is "about as scientifically rigorous and independent an institution as they come. Its evaluations are conducted by senior academic and regulatory scientists, drawn from around the world, and subject to a strict conflict of interest policy. IARC insists that its evaluations are transparent and so all evidence used to support its evaluations must be publicly available. The evaluation process is guided by published scientific principles and assessment criteria, and is explained in considerable detail in IARC’s monographs."

Chemical reactions: glyphosate and the politics of chemical safety
by Patrick van Zwanenberg, The Guardian, 13 May 2015

Controversy over a new evaluation of glyphosate, the world’s most widely used herbicide, lifts the lid on aspects of chemical safety regulation that often remain hidden from public view.

Glyphosate, the world’s most widely used herbicide, hit the headlines in March after the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) announced that it is a “probable human carcinogen”.

The IARC, which is responsible for providing an evidence base for the cancer control policies of the World Health Organisation and its members, had completed a year long review of the scientific literature on the herbicide. It found “convincing evidence” that glyphosate causes cancer in laboratory animals, “limited evidence” that it does so in agricultural workers, and evidence that it causes DNA and chromosomal damage in human cells.
Read more »

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8743

Trending Articles